Any product that's held in high regard by such reliable sources should be considered by anyone that's looking for a Microphone at this price point.Īs for the Blue Ember analysis - it impressed reviewers at, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its " The Best Microphones for Podcasters" roundup and earned the "Ranked 2 out of 5" title. Aside from the lack of accessories included with the microphone, at the $99.99 asking price, the Blue Ember is an Amazing condenser microphone for those looking to sound more professional without having to spend a lot of money on high-end XLR microphone setup.The Shure MV7 has done great in a couple of roundups conducted by highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like PCmag, Laptop Mag, and SoundGuys - it earned the "Best for Vocals" title from PCmag, "Ranked 1 out of 6" from Laptop Mag, and "Ranked 1 out of 5" from SoundGuys. Youll need a device that has a 48v phantom power input, a microphone stand, a pop filter that attaches to your stand (some stands include a pop filter that attaches to the stand) and XLR cables as theyre not included with the purchase of the microphone. However, the ember does require some accessories in order to get the most out of it. The Blue Ember is a most definitely contender for Best Bang per Buck when talking strictly about the microphone. Also keep in mind that the audio clips below are the recordings with the microphone set to zero mic boost so that the microphone is presented in its default form. ![]() The clips are strictly just the microphone connected the pre-amp and then connected to the PC. You can hear the difference for yourself by listening to the two audio clips below. Ive had issues with many different types of microphones and the Ember really impressed me. I was very surprised how well the Ember was able to pick up the low frequencies of my voice with very little distortion. Im told that I have a deep voice and it causes many microphones to suffer from distortion. I thought it sounded good until I heard myself on the Blue Ember. ![]() My previous microphone was the Neewer NW-700 Professional Studio Broadcasting & Recording Condenser Microphone ( $28.99 shipped) was by no means a high-end XLR condenser mic model. I would recommend getting a pop filter that attaches to your stand that will allow you to talk as you normally would without having to train your vocals to avoid any plosives into the mic. The Ember does lack the option of a traditional slip-over pop filter as is quite a narrow microphone, but Blue has put in a lot of effort in designing the grille on the Ember to act similar to a pop filter but not as well as a pop filter. That means it doesnt take up a lot of space and allowing users that use a camera in their content to see more of their facial movements and expressions rather than a massive XLR microphone. Sticking with their modern sleek designs, the Blue Ember has a narrow tube-like design that allows it to feel like its not so in your face. However, even though it is not listed as being so, I do believe the S3 Shock is compatible with the Ember microphone of which retails for $99.99 (CAD 134.45). According to Blues website, the S2 Shock mount is not compatible with the Blue Ember. I do wish that a shock mount was included with the microphone but that would increase the overall price.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |